Evan Ward Evan Ward's Profile Page

Evan Ward Evan Ward

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Maximize Your Success with DumpExam Customizable PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test

2025 Latest DumpExam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF Dumps and ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=11NcKVlsAk51TmcrDsAfM7pbVh8eo0j5F

Our ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam exam question has been widely praised by all of our customers in many countries and our company has become the leader in this field. Our product boost varied functions and they include the self-learning and the self-assessment functions, the timing function and the function to stimulate the exam to make you learn efficiently and easily. There are many advantages of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Tool.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.

Topic 2

AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

Topic 3

Managing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.

>> Valid Study ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions <<

100% Pass 2025 PECB Latest Valid Study ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions

There is no denying that no exam is easy because it means a lot of consumption of time and effort. Especially for the upcoming ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam, although a large number of people to take the exam every year, only a part of them can pass. If you are also worried about the exam at this moment, please take a look at our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials, whose content is carefully designed for the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam, rich question bank and answer to enable you to master all the test knowledge in a short period of time.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q49-Q54):

NEW QUESTION # 49
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
Based on Scenario 4, does the level of detail in the audit plan adequately reflect all aspects recommended for a comprehensive risk-based approach to planning?

A. Yes, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan reflects all the necessary aspects
B. No, detailed audit procedures should have been prioritized based on the level of risk, from lowest to highest
C. No, the audit plan should have focused on nonconformities only
D. No, the audit plan should have included sufficient detail correlating with the risk of not achieving the audit objectives

Answer: D

Explanation:
The audit plan should correlate directly withthe risk of not achieving the audit objectives, meaning higher- risk areas need more scrutiny.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1 and ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.1 emphasize that audit planning must berisk-based, addressing critical risk areas sufficiently to meet audit objectives.
* Lead Auditor TrainingModule 3 highlights:"An audit plan must be sufficiently detailed based on risks to ensure critical activities receive proportionate audit attention." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1.

NEW QUESTION # 50
Scenario 2 (continued):
Empsy HR Solutions is a human resources consulting company that provides innovative HR solutions to diverse industries. Recognizing the significant impact of artificial intelligence Al in HR processes, including its ability to automate repetitive tasks, analyze vast amounts of data for insights, improve recruitment and talent management strategies, and personalize employee experiences, the company has initiated the implementation of an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001.
Initially, the top management established an Al policy that was aligned with the company's objectives. The Al policy provided a framework for defining Al objectives, a commitment to meeting relevant requirements, and a dedication to continually improve the AIMS. However, it did not refer to other organizational policies, although some were relevant to the AIMS. Afterward, the top management documented the policy, communicated it internally, and made it accessible to interested parties.
The top management designated specific individuals to ensure that the AIMS meets the standard's requirements. Additionally, they ensured that these individuals were responsible for overseeing the AIMS, reporting its performance to the top management, and facilitating continual improvement. Moreover, in its awareness sessions, the company focused exclusively on ensuring that all personnel were informed about the Al policy, emphasizing their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS and the benefits of enhanced Al performance.
The company also planned, implemented, and monitored processes to meet AIMS requirements. Additionally, it set clear criteria and implemented controls based on them, ensuring effective operation, alignment with organizational objectives, and continual improvement. Empsy HR Solutions decided to implement strict measures to control changes to documented information within the AIMS. To ensure the integrity and accuracy of documentation, the company adopted version control practices. Each document update was tracked using a versioning system, with clear records of what was modified, who made the changes, and when the updates occurred. Access to make changes was restricted to authorized personnel, and any proposed modifications required approval from the designated management team before being implemented.
Moreover, considering past experiences where the company encountered unforeseen risks, Empsy HR Solutions established a comprehensive Al risk assessment process. This process involved identifying, analyzing, and evaluating Al risks to determine if it is necessary to implement additional controls than those specified in Annex A. The company also referred to Annex B for guidance on implementing controls and, ultimately, produced a Statement of Applicability So A. The SoA contained the necessary controls, including all the controls of Annex A and justifications for their inclusion or exclusion.
Lastly. Empsy HR Solutions decided to establish an internal audit program to ensure the AIMS conforms to both the company's requirements and ISO/IEC 42001. It defined the audit objectives, criteria, and scope for each audit, selected auditors, and ensured objectivity and impartiality during the audit process. The results of the first audit were documented and reported only to the top management of the company.
Question:
Based on Scenario 2, was the awareness session conducted in accordance with the requirements of Clause 7.3 Awareness of ISO/IEC 42001?

A. Yes, the awareness session informed employees about the AI policy and highlighted their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS
B. Yes, because awareness sessions focus only on AI policy
C. No, the awareness session should also communicate the implications of not conforming to the AIMS requirements
D. No, the awareness session should also explain the justification for the inclusion and the exclusion of Annex A controls

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 7.3 requires that awareness training should not only inform employees about the AI policy and roles but also communicate the implications of nonconformance with AIMS requirements.
Since Empsy HR Solutions missed this, it is non-compliant.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.3 (Awareness).

NEW QUESTION # 51
Scenario 5 (continued):
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by using advanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leader despite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team of seven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whether physical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition had been defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives and documented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the audit activities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks and opportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initial contact. The initial contact aimed to confirm the communication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, and summarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. During this first meeting, Robert emphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides or interpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issues and finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-related data governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
He discussed this need with Aizoia's management, proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governance practices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the audit based on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, were all the recommended aspects covered during the initial contact with Aizoia?

A. No, the negotiation of the final audit fee and payment schedule was not covered
B. Yes, all the required aspects were covered during the initial contact
C. No, the agreement with the auditee regarding the extent of the disclosure and the treatment of confidential information was not confirmed

Answer: C

Explanation:
The scenario does not mention addressing confidentiality agreements, which is mandatory during the initial contact.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1 and ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.3 both require that agreements about confidentiality, access rights, and data protection must be confirmed before starting the audit.
* The Lead Auditor Manual highlights: "Initial contact meetings must establish the treatment of confidential information and audit-related disclosure agreements." Reference: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.3.

NEW QUESTION # 52
Which control in Annex A of ISO 42001:2023 focuses on the need for stakeholder engagement in AI system development?

A. Continuous Improvement
B. Data Management
C. Stakeholder Consultation
D. Risk Assessment

Answer: C

Explanation:
Annex A - Control A.5.2.2: Stakeholder Consultationexplicitly requires organizations toconsult with relevant stakeholders(such as users, impacted communities, regulators, etc.) during the development and operation of AI systems.
This control emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders toidentify expectations, values, ethical concerns, and social impact risksassociated with the AI system.
Stakeholder engagement supports transparency, ethical alignment, and social acceptability of AI solutions.

NEW QUESTION # 53
Question:
What type of audit is conducted when a customer audits suppliers to make purchasing decisions?

A. Second-party audit
B. First-party audit
C. Third-party audit

Answer: A

Explanation:
ASecond-party auditis conducted by customers on their suppliers to verify whether the supplier's processes or products meet the purchasing requirements.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 3.11defines second-party audits as:"Audits conducted by a customer on their suppliers or by organizations on others with whom they have a contractual interest."
* This is referenced by ISO/IEC 42001:2023 when explaining supply chain risk management in AI systems (Clause 8.1).
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 3.11; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 8.1.

NEW QUESTION # 54
......

The DumpExam is one of the leading brands that have been helping PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Certification aspirants for many years. Hundreds of PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam exam applicants have achieved the ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam in Procurement and Supply PECB certification. All these successful PECB test candidates have prepared with real and updated ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam in Procurement and Supply PECB Questions of DumpExam. If you also want to become ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam in Procurement and Supply PECB certified, you should also prepare with our PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam actual exam questions.

Updated ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Testkings: https://www.dumpexam.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-valid-torrent.html

2025 Latest DumpExam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF Dumps and ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=11NcKVlsAk51TmcrDsAfM7pbVh8eo0j5F

Evan Ward Evan Ward

Biography

যোগাযোগ

কুইক লিংক

ক্যারিয়ার

কমিউনিটি